Miss Lee complains that she should not be made to pay for the errors made by the Trustees which resulted in an overpayment of her pension benefits. In particular, she says that she should not be made to repay any outstanding overpaid moni …

M Morgan complains of: delay in setting up his pension; inadequate annuity quotations; bias against him; collection of unnecessary information about him. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld in part …

Mr Moir complains that his pension was stopped and he was denied increases due to him. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against the Oakbank School Trust because it did not pay Mr Moir his pension regularly, did not pay pension increases and sought to avoid paying Mr Moir a pensio …

Mrs Hedley’s complaint is that she has been incorrectly refused ill health early retirement from preserved pension status. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against the Authority to the extent that they failed to obtain a proper assessmen …

Mr A complains that the MPA, his previous employer unfairly reduced his injury benefit in December 2007 and that following his appeal the MPA refused to refer his case back to the Police Medical Appeal Board (PMAB) under Regulation 32(2) The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reaso …

Interface Europe Ltd and the Trustees of the Interface Europe Pension Scheme failed to inform Mr Walsh correctly of a change in his membership status; and failed to consider him for an ill health pension before his employment was terminated T …

Mr Whitehurst asserts that the review of his injury benefit undertaken in 2006 was not conducted in accordance with the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against Nottinghamshire Police Auth …

Mr Gutteridge’s complaint is that ReAssure have failed to maintain records of his protected rights contributions. Consequently no protected rights benefits were included within Mr Gutteridge’s policy, when it was transferred to his new provider Just Retirement. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reason …

The Deputy Pension Protection Fund (PPF) Ombudsman has received a reference of a reviewable matter, following a decision by the Reconsideration Committee of the PPF dated 23 September 2011. The referral concerns the Scheme’s risk based levy for the 2010/2011 levy year, which is a reviewable matter under paragraph 19 of Schedule 9 ofthe Pensions Act 2004.

Dr Timmins challenges the decision by NHSBSA to offset a portion of his damages settlement against his Permanent Injury Benefits (PIB) award. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The dispute should be found against NHSBSA because they have not correctly construed Regulation 17 of th …