Thomas Cook UK DC Pension Scheme (CAS-75043-G1Y2)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mrs N’s complaint is partly upheld. I do not find that Aviva or the Trustee need to take any further action at present.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
Thomas Cook UK DC Pension Scheme (CAS-76480-G0L9)
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
Mr N’s complaint is partly upheld. To put matters right, Aviva shall follow the actions set out in the section, “Directions”.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
Prudential Personal Pension Plan (CAS-45689-F6H6
Ombudsman’s Determination
Outcome
I do not uphold Ms N’s complaint and no further action is required by Prudential.
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
Compass Group Pension Plan (CAS-43151-R0L7)
Related decisions
London Clubs Limited Pension Scheme (PO-28860)
Related decisions
Alliance Trust Pensions Limited Sipp for the benefit of Trevor Shonfield (83083/2)
Ms Powell complains of maladministration by Alliance Trust, in that they caused an undue delay in transferring funds to her new pension arrangement. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should not be u …
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
M Limited (81482/2)
Ms S complains that the Trustees of the Scheme provided incorrect or incomplete information about the Scheme to the Court prior to a Pension Sharing Order being made; and made an inappropriate payment, which reduced the value of the Scheme and would give rise to a tax charge. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination a …
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
Hornbuckle & Mitchell SIPP (84269/1)
Hornbuckle Mitchell Trustees Ltd and Baillie Hutchison, the trustees of the. SIPP, and Hornbuckle Mitchell Group Ltd, the administrators, failed to put into effect a pension sharing order. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons …
View determination
DownloadRelated decisions
Teachers’ Pension Scheme (82981/3)
Mrs Culverwell complains about the manner in which TP have implemented her Pension Sharing Order (PSO) In particular, that her former husband was permitted to take his benefits from the Scheme despite having given an undertaking to the court that he would not draw his pension before the PSO …