The British Steel Pension Scheme (PO-136)
Mr Cutts complains that his application for early release of his pension on incapacity grounds (IHP” was wrongfully declined. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reason …
Mr Cutts complains that his application for early release of his pension on incapacity grounds (IHP” was wrongfully declined. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reason …
Mrs Hamilton: disagrees with Cross Keys’ decision not to award her ill-health retirement benefits from active service, and says that her complaint was not considered properly at Stage 2 of the Internal Dispute Resolution Procedure (IDRP) The Dep …
Mr Maddison complains about the Trustees’ and the Company’s decision not to award him ill health early retirement The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld ag …
Ms Carroll has complained against the Royal Mail and the Trustee because her request for an ill health pension has not been successful. Appeal I originally issued a determination in March 2012, which Ms Carroll subsequently appealed. Followin …
Mr Pinkstone complains that, following the reconsideration of his application for an ill-health retirement pension, he continues to disagree with the level of benefits he has been awarded. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be uphel …
Mrs Bonner complains about Strathclyde Police’s decision not to award her ill health early retirement.
The complaint should be upheld against Strathclyde Police because they failed to follow the correct procedures in making their decision and also failed to identify and address the apparent inconsistencies in the medical advice obtained.
Mr Dorward disagrees with the decision by Sunderland not to backdate the early payment of his benefits on the grounds of ill health. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be partly upheld against Sunderland City Council because th …
Ms Linard complains that a decision as to her entitlement to an ill health pension from the Scheme has not been made. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against: CT Plus because Ms Linard’s employment was tra …
Ms Lavelle disagrees with the decision not to award her ill health early retirement in 2008. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against Lancashire County Council because they failed to consider Ms Lavelle’s eligibility for payment of ben …
Mr Wilson complains that: the Trustees would not consider further medical evidence from him in relation to his claim for an ill-health early retirement pension under Rule 18.1(F) of the Fund; and the Trustees delayed in providing him with a quotation for a reduced ear …