Miss Pedder disagrees with TPs’ decision not to award her a child’s benefit from the TPS. She claims that she qualifies under the relevant regulations and TP have dismissed her claim without proper investigation. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against TP …

M Morgan complains of: delay in setting up his pension; inadequate annuity quotations; bias against him; collection of unnecessary information about him. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld in part …

Mr Moir complains that his pension was stopped and he was denied increases due to him. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against the Oakbank School Trust because it did not pay Mr Moir his pension regularly, did not pay pension increases and sought to avoid paying Mr Moir a pensio …

Mr Brown complains that the Railways Pension Trustee Company Limited (the trustee) improperly refused him an incapacity pension. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against the trustee, because the trustee went beyond the provisions of the …

Mr Brown’s complaint is that because of NHS Pensions’ delays and lack of care shown in calculating his correct pensionable service, he was unable to draw his entitlement from the NHS Pension Scheme (the Scheme) in 2009. The Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint should be upheld against NHS Pensions to the extent …

Mr Sutton complains that when his pension was transferred to a new Scheme, his right to early retirement at age 60 without the need for employer consent was lost, without his agreement. The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman’s determination and short reasons The complaint shoul …

Mr Lightfoot has complained that a trustee of the Firmware Technology Group Pension Scheme, Mrs S Lightfoot (now preferring to be known under her maiden name of Ms S MacLellan, and so referred to below under that name) refuses to agree to the sale of the Scheme’s assets that would enable him …

Mr Simpson is complaining that CITB and the Trustees have wrongly refused to award him benefits under Rule 27.2 (compulsory retirement pension) and that he was not informed that he would not qualify for benefits under Rule 27.2 when he was re …

Essentially, there are three parts to Mr Claridge’s complaint against his former employer, the Trust: they delayed the payment of his retirement lump sum; his pension was set up with an incorrect commencement date – 10 February 2012, rather than 10 March 2012; his pensio …

Mrs Knight’s complaint against the University is that she was led to believe that by taking voluntary severance she would be able to take her benefits from the Scheme immediately on an unreduced basis. Later she received a communication from the Scheme administrator …